>>     >>   Jaitley defamation case: Delhi HC imposes penalty on Kejriwal

Arun Jaitley defamation case: Delhi High Court imposes penalty on Kejriwal for delay in response

Joint Registrar Pankaj Gupta directed the Delhi chief minister, who was earlier too fined with Rs 10,000 as cost, to deposit Rs 5,000 in the 'Army Welfare Fund Battle Casualties'.


By   |  Updated On : September 04, 2017 06:52 PM
Jaitley defamation case: Delhi High Court imposes penalty on Kejriwal for delay in response

Jaitley defamation case: Delhi High Court imposes penalty on Kejriwal for delay in response

New Delhi :  

The Delhi High Court on Monday slapped another Rs 5,000  fine on Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal over delay in filing his reply  in connection with fresh Rs 10 crore defamation suit filed by Union minister Arun Jaitley.

Kejriwal’s former lawyer, Ram  Jethmalani, had allegedly used  objectionable word against Jaitley during cross examination.

Joint Registrar Pankaj Gupta directed the Delhi chief minister, who was earlier too fined with Rs 10,000 as cost, to deposit Rs 5,000 in the 'Army Welfare Fund Battle Casualties'.

The cost was imposed after Jaitley's counsel Manik Dogra informed the court that the chief minister's written statement to the suit was filed beyond the time of two weeks granted by this court on July 26.

The counsel further submitted that these were delayed tactics on the part of the chief minister.

Advocate Rishikesh Kumar, appearing for Kejriwal, urged the court to condone the delay on the ground that the written statement could not be filed due to certain technical objections raised on two occasions by the High Court Registry.

Taking note of this submission, the Registrar condoned the delay on behalf of the chief minister and said the same is "subject to deposit of Rs 5,000 costs."

The court has now fixed the matter for October 12. Meanwhile, Kejriwal, in his reply to the defamation suit, filed through advocate Anupam Srivastava submitted that the union minister's suit "is liable to be dismissed as no civil action for damages for slander lies for any statement in pleadings or during the conduct of a suit against a party or a itness in it."

The high court had on May 23 sought response of Kejriwal on why defamation proceedings should not be initiated against him.

Jaitley had filed the second defamation suit after Kejriwal's then lawyer Ram Jethmalani allegedly "abused" him in open court during proceedings of another defamation suit he had filed against the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) chief and five other party functionaries.

Also Read: Arun Jaitley rubbishes Kejriwal's claim on libel suit in Delhi HC

During the cross-examination of the Union minister on May 17 before the Joint Registrar in the High Court, Jethmalani had allegedly used a term Jaitley had found objectionable.

A day after, another high court judge, who was hearing a connected matter, had termed as "scandalous" the remarks allegedly made by Jethmalani against Jaitley before the Joint Registrar. (With PTI inputs)

First Published: Monday, September 04, 2017 03:50 PM


Download the News Nation Mobile App and stay connected with top stories from India and around the world. Available on Android and IOS.


NEXT STORY