New Delhi:
Outsourcing firm iGate has been slapped with class action lawsuit in the US for alleged violations of federal securities laws in view of its sacked CEO Phaneesh Murthy's "improper relationship" with a subordinate employee.
The suit has been filed on behalf of persons or entities who purchased or acquired securities of iGate between March 14, 2012 and May 21, 2013.
The New York-Based law firm, Pomerantz Grossman Hufford Dahlstrom & Gross LLP, filed the class action lawsuit against US-based iGate Corporation and some of its officers in the US District Court of Northern District of California on June 14.
According to the law firm, the complaint has alleged that throughout the class period, defendants (iGate) had made materially false and misleading statements regarding its business, operational and compliance policies.
"Specifically, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that" (i) the company's Chief Executive Officer and President 'Murthy' was involved in an improper relationship with a subordinate employee in violation of iGate's explicit policies to the contrary.
"(ii) Murthy's improper conduct created a risk that he would be terminated from the company, jeopardising the company's future success."
iGate had sacked Murthy on May 20 for allegedly failing to report a relationship with a subordinate employee.
The suit has been filed to recover damages against the firm and some of its officers and directors on account of alleged violations of the federal securities laws pursuant to Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
"The class action, filed in United States District Court, Northern District of California, and docketed under CV 13 2737 PSG LHK, is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired securities of iGate between March 14, 2012 and May 21, 2013 both dates inclusive," the law firm said in a statement.
It further added that the action seeks to "recover damages against the company and certain of its officers and directors as a result of alleged violations of the federal securities laws pursuant to Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder."
When contacted, an iGate spokesperson said: "We believe that this claim has no merit, and we intend to vigorously defend this action. No other similar claims have been filed."
On being asked whether there was a lapse on its part in hiring Murthy, who was earlier involved in a similar controversy, the spokesperson said iGate investigated the sexual harassment claims made against him before his joining.
"Murthy was part of the management team acquired with the Quintant acquisition. Prior to the acquisition, iGate conducted due diligence into the prior sexual harassment claims made against Mr Murthy. A subsequent inveiGatestigation was conducted by one of our major shareholders," he added.
