>>     >>   Ayodhya matter: SC grants 3-month for translation of documents

Ayodhya matter: SC grants 3-month time for translation of historic documents; further hearing on Dec 5

In the Ayodhya matter, Supreme Court on Friday granted three-month time for making translation of the historic documents. The SC fixed the matter for further hearing till December 5.


  |  Updated On : August 11, 2017 04:52 PM
Ayodhya matter: SC grants 3-month for translation of documents (File photo)

Ayodhya matter: SC grants 3-month for translation of documents (File photo)

New Delhi :  

In the Ayodhya matter, Supreme Court on Friday granted three-month time for making translation of the historic documents. The SC fixed the matter for further hearing till December 5.

Sunni Waqf board told SC that the translation of historic documents is not complete yet.

The apex court, after an intense deliberation for more than one-and-half-hours, reached a consensus on commencement of the hearing on the cross-appeals filed against the 2010 judgement of the Allahabad High Court.

The high court had ruled a three-way division of the disputed 2.77 acre area at Ayodhya among the parties— the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and the Ram Lalla.

A specially constituted bench, headed by Justice Dipak Misra, asked the contesting parties to complete the translation of the exhibits of the documents likely to be relied upon into English within 12 weeks since these were in eight different languages.

The bench, also comprising justices Ashok Bhushan and Abdul Nazeer, asked the Uttar Pradesh government to complete within 10 weeks the translation of the evidence recorded for adjudication of the title dispute in the high court into English.

The bench made it clear that the parties would have to strictly adhere to the time frame fixed by it and no adjournment shall be given in any circumstances.

Senior counsel C S Vaidyanathan, appearing for Lord Ram Lalla and Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the UP government, pressed for early hearing of the matter, but senior advocates Kapil Sibal, Anoop George Chaudhari and Rajeev Dhavan, representing other parties, were not in favour of commencement of the hearing before January next year.

With PTI inputs

First Published: Friday, August 11, 2017 04:18 PM


Download the News Nation Mobile App and stay connected with top stories from India and around the world. Available on Android and IOS.


NEXT STORY